LLM run #10

agent · model: deep · target: agent:trace_interpreter · 17.1s · ok

{"context": {"attempt_id": "aqa-dd6a8081b313", "learner_id": "usr-timur-3b11737e"}, "input": {"prior": {"grader_observations": {"status": "graded", "grading_json": {"criteria": [{"criterion": "engineering_object", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "No concrete engineering object (part, system, model, agent) is identified. The submission is a philosophical statement, not an engineering specification.", "evidence": "The model is not the person who answers.", "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "constraints", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "No constraints (load, material, safety, cost, etc.) are specified. The prompt lacks any operational boundaries.", "evidence": null, "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "operating_context", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "No lifecycle stage, operating conditions, or usage scenario is defined. The context is abstract and non-operational.", "evidence": null, "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "question_strategy", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "The prompt does not force the AI to ask clarifying questions. It is a declarative statement, not an interactive engineering task.", "evidence": "The model is not the person who answers.", "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "verification", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "No verification criteria, calculation, or test are specified. There is no way to check the AI's output against external criteria.", "evidence": null, "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "traceability", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "No traceability is established. There are no inputs linked to conclusions because no engineering work was performed.", "evidence": null, "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "delegation_boundary", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "The boundary between human and AI responsibility is not defined in an operational sense. The student states a principle but does not assign specific tasks or verification duties.", "evidence": "The model is not the person who answers.", "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "anti_slop", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "The submission is purely decorative/philosophical phrasing without operational specifics. It fails to provide any engineering content to grade.", "evidence": "The model is not the person who answers.", "trace_type": null}], "total_score": 0.0, "passed": false, "summary": "The submission is a philosophical statement rather than an engineering prompt. It lacks all required engineering elements: object, constraints, context, verification, and delegation boundaries. The student must rewrite the prompt to specify a concrete engineering task, define constraints, and establish a clear verification protocol.", "failure_modes": ["generic_prompt", "missing_constraints", "missing_operating_context", "missing_verification", "missing_traceability", "unclear_delegation_boundary"], "trace_events": [], "student_model_delta": {}, "norm_deviation": {"deviation_detected": false, "deviation_type": null, "severity": null}, "confidence": 0.95, "requires_human_review": false, "intervention_recommended": false}, "passed": false, "score": 0.0, "prompt_hash": "478456966707ed98", "duration_ms": 20598, "trace_events": [], "student_model_delta": {}, "norm_deviation": {"deviation_detected": false, "deviation_type": null, "severity": null}, "failure_modes": ["generic_prompt", "missing_constraints", "missing_operating_context", "missing_verification", "missing_traceability", "unclear_delegation_boundary"], "confidence": 0.95, "requires_human_review": false, "intervention_recommended": false, "llm_run_id": 9, "judge_model": "qwen3.8-27b-w4a16-awq", "tokens_used": 2749, "cost_usd": null}}, "assignment_id": "asn-3e1f38b98134"}}

{"agent_id": "trace_interpreter", "agent_version": "1.0.0", "decision_explanation": {"observation": "Input contains grading results with a score of 0.0 and a list of failure modes, but the `trace_events` array is empty. The grader identified the submission as a philosophical statement lacking engineering specifics.", "interpretation": "The absence of `trace_events` means there is no raw data to classify into the 5 semantic layers. According to canonical registries, absence of data is M0 (not_observed), not M1 (absent). The trace level is T0 (none) because no events were recorded or provided.", "evidence": "Input field `trace_events` is an empty list `[]`. Grader feedback confirms no engineering work was performed, hence no operational trace exists.", "selected_rule": "Apply T0 (none) for trace_level and `insufficient_data` or `scene_invalid` logic for completeness, as required by \u00a77.29.57 (forbidden inference: absence of data -> M1 is forbidden; it is M0/not_observed).", "alternative_rules": "Could have attempted to infer trace from grader feedback, but this violates the prohibition against filling gaps with plausible stories (\u00a77.29.57 point 5/10).", "selected_action": "Generate a trace summary reflecting the empty state, marking completeness as invalid due to missing required events, and listing the grader's failure modes as unresolved gaps.", "expected_new_information": "A new attempt with actual trace events or a corrected submission that generates trace data.", "state_change_constraints": "Cannot assign M2+ or HI1+ states. Cannot mark trace_level higher than T0."}, "provenance": {"model": "qwen3.8-27b-w4a16-awq", "prompt_version": "1.0.0", "ts": "2024-05-22T12:00:00Z"}, "uncertainty": ["The specific content of the student's submission is only known via grader summary, not raw text.", "Whether the empty trace_events is a system error or a genuine lack of action is ambiguous, but treated as lack of action per input."], "refusal": null, "trace_events_to_emit": [], "state_updates_proposed": [], "trace_summary": {"attempt_id": "aqa-dd6a8081b313", "trace_level": "T0", "completeness_status": "insufficient_data", "five_layers": {"technical": [], "operational": [], "epistemic": [], "subject": [], "production": []}, "summary": {"human_actions": [], "machine_actions": [], "seams": [], "corrections": [], "final_decision": "Submission rejected due to lack of engineering content and missing trace data.", "decision_owner": "grader"}, "unresolved_gaps": ["No trace events recorded for this attempt.", "Submission lacks concrete engineering object.", "Submission lacks constraints and operating context.", "Submission lacks verification criteria.", "Submission lacks traceability.", "Submission lacks clear delegation boundary."], "interface_effects_detected": []}}