LLM run #2

exercise_grading · model: fast · target: exercise:ex-01-clarifying-eng-prompt · 11.2s · ok

{"exercise_id": "ex-01-clarifying-eng-prompt", "exercise_type": "prompt"}

{"criteria": [{"criterion": "engineering_object", "score": 2, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "The engineering object is identified as a 'крыло малого беспилотника' which is not aligned with the task requirement to design a steel L-bracket for solar panel mounting. The student failed to name the correct engineering object relevant to the prompt.", "evidence": "Объект: крыло малого беспилотника в горизонтальном поле.", "trace_type": "engineering_object_detected"}, {"criterion": "constraints", "score": 3, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "Multiple constraints are provided (load, area, weight, angle), but they pertain to an aircraft wing context, not the solar panel mounting bracket and earthquake zone. The constraints do not include environment or tolerance details relevant to the original brief.", "evidence": "Ограничения: скорость 22 м/с, плотность воздуха 1.225 кг/м³, площадь крыла 0.42 м², угол атаки до 8°, нельзя выходить за допустимую нагрузку на лонжерон.", "trace_type": "constraint_added"}, {"criterion": "operating_context", "score": 2, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "The operating context (load, velocity, attack angle) is described for an aircraft wing in horizontal flight, with no mention of lifecycle phase or seismic environment as required by the task.", "evidence": "Контекст: полёт на малой высоте, без обледенения, штатная масса аппарата 6.5 кг.", "trace_type": "operating_context_added"}, {"criterion": "question_strategy", "score": 1, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "There is no explicit question in the prompt asking the AI to clarify missing data or request additional information needed for a complete design.", "evidence": null, "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "verification", "score": 2, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "Verification criteria are mentioned for acceptable wing load tolerance, but these are unrelated to a solar panel bracket system and lack a clear plan for engineering verification steps or tests tied to the delegated AI work.", "evidence": "Критерий проверки: предусмотрена сила должна быть не ниже веса аппарата с запасом 20%; результат проверки рассчитывается расчетом по коэффициенту подъёмной силы и сравнению с ограничениями конструкции.", "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "traceability", "score": 2, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "Some attempt at traceability exists by linking calculations to load factors and aerodynamic coefficients, but they are irrelevant for the required engineering object and task context. No direct trace from input prompt to final artifacts.", "evidence": "Трассировка: скорость, площадь, плотность и угол атаки связаны с расчетом подъёмной силы с расчетом по коэффициенту подъёмной силы и сравнением с ограничениями конструкции.", "trace_type": "traceability"}, {"criterion": "delegation_boundary", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "The prompt does not specify what part of the engineering work the AI is responsible for and what remains the engineer’s responsibility. There is no delegation boundary described.", "evidence": null, "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "anti_slop", "score": 1, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "The submission contains generic descriptions unrelated to the specific engineering task. It contains no forbidding of final answers without engineer review, and no clear operational prompt, suggesting decorative or misplaced content rather than operational engineering prompting.", "evidence": "Цель: оценить подъёмную силу на крейсерской скорости.", "trace_type": null}], "total_score": 0.29, "passed": false, "summary": "The student failed to identify the correct engineering object and relevant constraints for the task, providing information about an aircraft wing instead of a steel bracket for solar panel mounting in a seismic zone. The prompt lacks a delegation boundary and does not require the AI to ask clarifying questions or forbid final answers without engineer verification. The submission needs to be completely refocused to align with the exercise brief and include clear delegation, constraints, verification methods, and AI question strategy.", "failure_modes": ["generic_prompt", "missing_constraints", "missing_operating_context", "missing_verification", "missing_traceability", "unclear_delegation_boundary", "premature_solution", "anti_slop"], "trace_events": [{"trace_type": "engineering_object_detected", "content": {"engineering_object": "крыло малого беспилотника"}, "confidence": 0.9}, {"trace_type": "constraint_added", "content": {"constraints": ["скорость 22 м/с", "плотность воздуха 1.225 кг/м³", "площадь крыла 0.42 м²", "угол атаки до 8°"]}, "confidence": 0.9}, {"trace_type": "operating_context_added", "content": {"context": "полёт на малой высоте, без обледенения, штатная масса аппарата 6.5 кг"}, "confidence": 0.8}], "student_model_delta": {"engineering_object": -1.5, "constraints": -1.0, "operating_context": -1.0, "question_strategy": -4.0, "verification": -3.0, "traceability": -2.0, "delegation_boundary": -5.0, "anti_slop": -4.0}, "norm_deviation": {"deviation_detected": true, "deviation_type": "generic_prompt", "severity": "high"}, "confidence": 0.85, "requires_human_review": false, "intervention_recommended": true}