LLM run #9

exercise_grading · model: fast · target: exercise:ex-warmup-sample-pass-s1-agent-not-person · 20.6s · ok

{"exercise_id": "ex-warmup-sample-pass-s1-agent-not-person", "exercise_type": "prompt"}

{"criteria": [{"criterion": "engineering_object", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "No concrete engineering object (part, system, model, agent) is identified. The submission is a philosophical statement, not an engineering specification.", "evidence": "The model is not the person who answers.", "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "constraints", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "No constraints (load, material, safety, cost, etc.) are specified. The prompt lacks any operational boundaries.", "evidence": null, "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "operating_context", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "No lifecycle stage, operating conditions, or usage scenario is defined. The context is abstract and non-operational.", "evidence": null, "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "question_strategy", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "The prompt does not force the AI to ask clarifying questions. It is a declarative statement, not an interactive engineering task.", "evidence": "The model is not the person who answers.", "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "verification", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "No verification criteria, calculation, or test are specified. There is no way to check the AI's output against external criteria.", "evidence": null, "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "traceability", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "No traceability is established. There are no inputs linked to conclusions because no engineering work was performed.", "evidence": null, "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "delegation_boundary", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "The boundary between human and AI responsibility is not defined in an operational sense. The student states a principle but does not assign specific tasks or verification duties.", "evidence": "The model is not the person who answers.", "trace_type": null}, {"criterion": "anti_slop", "score": 0, "max_score": 5, "feedback": "The submission is purely decorative/philosophical phrasing without operational specifics. It fails to provide any engineering content to grade.", "evidence": "The model is not the person who answers.", "trace_type": null}], "total_score": 0.0, "passed": false, "summary": "The submission is a philosophical statement rather than an engineering prompt. It lacks all required engineering elements: object, constraints, context, verification, and delegation boundaries. The student must rewrite the prompt to specify a concrete engineering task, define constraints, and establish a clear verification protocol.", "failure_modes": ["generic_prompt", "missing_constraints", "missing_operating_context", "missing_verification", "missing_traceability", "unclear_delegation_boundary"], "trace_events": [], "student_model_delta": {}, "norm_deviation": {"deviation_detected": false, "deviation_type": null, "severity": null}, "confidence": 0.95, "requires_human_review": false, "intervention_recommended": false}